Destiny offers us its paths, sometimes more obligingly and
involuntarily, for our present-future roles. A ‘Present-to-Future’ as those
circumstances for which no easy return to the old ways will be
facilitated to you after you have chosen this rabbit-hole of
possibility.
Those present-to-future roles will be formed by the lexicon you adopt to
define how you will have your interpreted definition of your perception.
It will be a fabrication from the deconstruction of your default carnal
culture’s lexicon to what you have discerned
as the more sublime and profound component threads of your
circumstances.I state this based on my own life path which had crucial and profound
events that re-arranged, even took away, the deck-chairs of my vessel’s
operational code and placed me in a position in which I had to forge my
own codes that would allow me to operate with
some coherent purpose.
It could be asked, “Why beyond some reductive adaptation to the given
social circumstances and paradigm’s would I need to think about a
special “coherent purpose”. I’d answer that my own past experiences left
me with the impression that the gains and rewards
offered within the social structure were more shallow and ephemeral for
my psyche than they were promoted to be for my prospective motivational
aspirations within the given social structure of my locale.
My “coherent purpose” was based on the relative meaningfulness of
certain ideas and techniques of action, which were well suited to my
temperament and skills of that moment in time. My unique life background
had a sequence of events, which individually happen
to most of us; but their uniques sequential chronology with me gave and
left me with options that were not as commonly ubiquitous in their
actuarial probability for other contemporaries of mine. This contrasting
distinction from what was anticipated and expected
to be a more conventional choice of options, made it necessary for me
to ask “Why?” than just give-in to the effects of the immediate,
sometimes adverse, circumstance.In asking “Why?!” I moved from self-pity to doing the best practically
feasible choice in what could be an adverse situation. Knowing that the
particular choice wasn’t congruent with the aspirations I had for the
moment, that helped to facilitate a rationale
whose logic and the linguistics of that logic developed patterns of
words which became code-signals of parameters for me.
“IN THE BEGINNING..” those coded-signals were a privately held, internal
thought database. As experience and time added to the aggregate of this
database of code-signals, they, much like molecules that form the
enzymes, that form the proteins of the tissues,
organs, and organ systems of the body, became a flow-of-consciousness of
a body of fluidity in an alternative narrative that challenged the
credence and relevantness of the social default narrative. At that
point, I felt compelled to a conscious choice of actions
that exhibited that preference. In the exhibition of that preference I began the metaphoric (maybe even
meta-metamorphic) transcendence from the thinking and the ways of my
default birth linguistic media culture to the forms in this, my
petri-dish of linguistic culture.
With that changing attitude, what was an implicit marginally default
distinction with my birth culture’s media, became more distinctively
explicit, and that precipitated challenges (more for) me and the former
default culture’s members. The reason for the more
challenging propositions between me and the birth culture, was that
what I had presumed for myself was, at best an indirect questioning and
subverting of what had been consensus presumptions of thoughts and their
myriad, derived expressions. Being more conscious
of this due to the institutional mores and traditions that had
developed in the birth culture, which predominated the physical and
rhetorical narrative of my social and cultural environs, I was
tip-toeing in deference to those institutional mores, since I
was a servicer for the operations and mission of whatever institution I
was associated. As time passed, the chafing constraints of the mores and individual,
enabling idiosyncrasies of the institution became more of an exoskeleton
or epidermis I needed to moult out from under, if I was to have any
coherence, let alone operational adherence to what
I recognized as the more aspirational qualities of my own coded
signals-my logos.
The need to be out-from-under this burdensome psychological epidermis or
exoskeleton begged the question of the extent of my relations to the
forms; represented by people, vocations, and paradigms, many of whom and
of which were legacy appendages of my past.
This forced me to begin the pruning purge within my own habits so to
give myself the cognitive space and leverage from the default birth
media’s people, vocations, and paradigms. Having been indoctrinated and
trained in being of service rather than self-aggrandizing
compounded the ways and the means of my attempts to prune and purge my own
activities to my now former linguistic medium-culture.
The passage of time’s multitude of experiences, through which I had to
live, provided the retrospective and prospective insights gained
methodically in irregularly sequenced trials and opportunities. My
growing awareness for the need for a more transformative
conscious ability were matched by the impatience of knowing I did not
have the knowledge for the transformative tools for those aspirations.
At the same time I realized my circumstances were iconoclastic enough
from the conventions of thought and actions of my contemporaries, that
some form of cognitive accessibility had gotten me to this point and
from which others would not have any clue of access
during their lifetime. The same could be said about me to those even
rarer few who were figurative light years advanced in their awareness to
which I aspired.
Could the difference be attributed solely to mundane factors of training
and the disciplines of focus from the training? Or WAS there the factor
of an embedded code in our genes from either the random placement in
our gestative genetics, OR from the incarnations
of the psyches of my (our) past?
I am more biased to believe in the possibility of having an intervening
incarnational past that had me at a stage of cognitive awareness, so
that my present incarnation only had to rediscover the triggering code
words, symbols, phrases, or meanings to be a
facilitating boost for my ‘insights’. It seems more logically plausible
than me being the improbablistic beneficiary of a fortuitous
biochemical, random happenstance.
Thus, our existence in this realm could be in a spectrum of
possibilities that would include existing, primarily, as the
carnally-based logistics operative, than to the metaphorical (or
meta-metamorphic) extension of our carnal base. The former
carnally-based
logistic
existence would be what the reductionists and objectivists would see as
the tangible ‘here-and-now’. In that here-n-now the lexicon would be
oriented to the concepts of all that is tangibly empirical or provable
within the carnal realms of presumptions and
assumptions. The latter, metaphorical/meta-
The social consequences would be levels of consciousness precipitated by
the oriented, beckoning focus on the symbols and meaning of the lexicon
of the chosen state of purpose and comfort. Those more closely
associated with the logistics for their physiological
genetic profile-for the reduction/objectivist orientation, would have a
lexicon that would facilitate the acquisitional operations for those
logistics. Those with a resonant affinity to the abstract
extrapolations from their logistical operations would see
the process of the operations rather than the possessed rewards of
those operations as the portals to thought connections of an expanded
matrix to their own dimensional potential beyond the tangible and
intangible logistics of the rat-race of their carnality.
In conclusion, it’s not about this lifetime. Carnal existence is the base camp to learn
the forms from which metaphorical extrapolations to other trans-carnal
operations may be conceived and comprehended.
No comments:
Post a Comment